Future Belongs to Those Who Oppose Drag Queen Story Hours
Today, the framework itself is in question. What is being discussed is the classical liberal foundation of the American political system. Indeed, both left and right have worked inside this framework for much of our nation’s history. Rarely have we faced such a challenge to the way America resolves its problems.
However, liberalism is in crisis. Our society is in shambles and drifting steadily leftward. The most outlandish behaviors – political correctness, transgenderism and Satanism—are being mainstreamed. People are questioning the system because there appear to be no mechanisms inside this framework to prevent this decay and drift. They are looking for other solutions.
The Drag Queen Story Hour Trigger
This new state of affairs found its expression in the ongoing dialogue between National Review’s David French and First Things contributor Sohrab Ahmari. The case that triggered the French-Ahmari debate is the proliferation of what are called Drag Queen Story Hours. These events feature transvestite men who read LGBTQ-themed stories to three-year-old-and-up children at tax-supported public libraries.
According to the classical liberal interpretation defended by French, the story hours are an expression of free speech, regrettably competing in the marketplace of ideas. While we may not like it, we should not suppress but celebrate these events as expressions of differing opinions of what comprises a vision of the good life in a pluralistic society.
Help Remove Jesus Toilet Lid on Amazon
Opposing parents and conservatives are told they must allow these tax-funded public forums. They take place in value-neutral platforms open to all. To deny one party access is to deny it to all.Reaching the Point of Absurdity
Hence comes the questioning. Common sense dictates that these events that corrupt youth be canceled.
Before our days, no one could ever have thought that we would have decayed to the point that drag queens would be reading to our three-year-olds. However, we have reached that point of absurdity. The maximizers of liberty have decreed that all must be permitted even though an overwhelming majority inside the community does not desire these lewd performances.
Satanic Christ Porn-blasphemy at Walmart — Sign Petition
In a democratic society, where the people are supposed to rule, how does this angry majority defend themselves against the Drag Queen Story Hours and similar things that happen in their communities?There appears to be no answer.
Liberty Gone Awry
For this reason, some say liberalism has failed because its inner dynamism has pushed unrestrained and disordered liberty beyond the limits needed for society to function properly. A social consensus around certain moral norms that used to filter excesses is crumbling and coming apart. A tiny minority can now tyrannize over others in the name of liberty gone awry.
The problem with liberalism is that its value-neutral public square easily becomes a value-free place where a Ten Commandments monument and a Satanist Baphomet statue share equal space. Sacred text and pornography are equally qualified as literature. There is no notion of a moral right and wrong, save that defined by the exercise of freedom. Except when it threatens the physical integrity of another, anything can and must be tolerated. We must recognize any absurd self-identification or pronoun.
How Panera’s Socialist Bread Ruined Company
Inside today’s framework, individual freedom trumps everything. Those opposing immorality in the public square have no ground upon which to stand. There are no criteria upon which to base the standards that would limit and restrain. A weak reference to tradition, custom or even public decency immediately gives rise to cries of imposing one co-equal opinion upon another—for indeed it is.Even an appeal to the common good or the highest good found in more classical political text falls upon deaf liberal ears since no one can define what is meant by good and even common.
No Declaration of Evil
We have reached a point where nothing can be declared definitively evil. Everything is good, save those who claim an exclusive title to good. There is no evil save those who declare other things to be intrinsically wrong. Whatever the individual decides is good and right. Even “consensual” cannibalism is defended in today’s sick public square.
As a result, those who establish the limits of what is “good” are those who forever push the envelope toward what is forbidden. Today, it is not Christianity that decides what is “moral,” but drag queens, LGBT activists and the Satanic Temple that are stretching the limits of social acceptability to their activities. And they are imposing their views upon the opposition with increasing severity.
Recourse to a Universal Moral Law
The only way to fight today’s destructive moral relativism is to have recourse to a universal moral law based on human nature and not individual whims. There must be a return to a natural law discussion that elevates the debate beyond the field of personal opinions and whims.
That is to say, there is a natural moral law, which Saint Paul says, is inscribed on the hearts of all men whereby all might know by reason those moral precepts that define the good in life. This law’s general precept, from which all the others follow, is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” This law is valid for all times and all people in all places.
This law is not limited to Christians, although the Church is its best guardian. Throughout history, it has provided that rock of moral stability that favored human prospering. It is hardly a novel invention since American law and English common law are rooted in natural law traditions. It is not too much to insist that we might return to our roots.
The Tyranny of Anti-Natural Law
The alternative is the coming tyranny. The next aberrations beyond the story hours will soon be upon us. When modernity abandoned natural law, it enthroned a kind of anti-natural law. It replaced the constraints of human nature with the ever-expanding expressions of freedom. This new anti-natural law gives free rein to Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s fantasy world where each has “the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.” Indeed, when the insatiable human passions rule, they prove to be the greatest of tyrants.
As seen on CNS News.
I am particularly fond of our Lady of Fatima and of the rosary and her Sacred Heart. In my search for others who love our Lady, I stumbled upon your blog and I read this post. It is a couple years old, so I am not sure if anyone is manning the comboxes or not, but I thought I would take the time to suggest a correction - or, at least, some research. The author of this piece says in several places that liberals are a tiny minority, and perhaps it SEEMS so, within the author's experience, but that is statistically incorrect. At present, in 2020, those who identify with a more progressive political agenda, are about 70%. If your focus is primarily political, you are fighting an uphill battle, and I don't think you will have much success with it because we can't force people to adhere to our values. A better tack would be evangelical, then you are going to have to appeal to the majority with the honey rather than the stick. We need to highlight the beautiful messages of our Lady, the miracles that even newspapers reported and took pictures of (the miracle of the sun.) We need to point to this positive, life-affirming and glorious manifestation of how much God loves us and wants us to come to Him. We can't force it or legislate it. The idea of drag queens telling stories to toddlers revolts me, but I WOULD say that the parents who approve of this ARE in the minority, even if what I say is true that liberals are in the majority, generally. Even liberals have limits. Extreme forms of expression have an audience with a small number of people - but the majority of people, even if turned off by them, would say they have a right to their expression and that you don't have to take your children to see one of these shows. This is what happens in a land where you have freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of religion and freedom of sexual orientation. The only way to combat it (if combat is even the right word to use, since it connotes some FIGHTING) - is to draw people with LOVE. Draw them to our Holy Mother with love. And to be spotless examples ourselves. Also, an emphasis on conversion and the absolute forgiveness of God assured to the repentant. That would be an attractive message. You can't force people. In a free country, these people will always be free to do what they do - but as a parent, all one has to do is to refuse to have our children and grandchildren attend these things, while at the same time inviting everyone to partake of our Lady's protection and guidance. Anyway, that's my two cents worth. Research the numbers on progressives vs. conservatives and I think you'll find that what I say is true, as far as the liberals being the majority rather than the minority you posit. God bless us all! Silver Rose
ReplyDelete